Skip to main content
TaxMath
← Compare states

Colorado vs Idaho: state income tax, 2025

For reference household P1 (single, $60,000 of wages), Colorado charges $1,947or less and Idaho charges $2,100or less. Both are bounded in the same direction, so the difference between them cannot be stated.

Both figures are a hypothetical full-year resident return for tax year 2025, over the same federal return, and count state income tax only. Neither is a relocation estimate: moving mid-year means two part-year returns, which this site does not figure. “Or less” means a mechanism the engine does not yet model would lower the figure; “or more” that it would raise it.

Six households, both states

HouseholdColoradoIdahoColorado minus Idaho
P1 Single, $60,000 of wages$1,947or less$2,100or lessnot bounded
P2 Married filing jointly, $150,000, two children$5,214or less$5,371or lessnot bounded
P3 Single, $85,000 wages + $15,000 long-term gain + $3,000 qualified dividends$3,839or less$4,379or lessnot bounded
P4 Married retirees, $40,000 Social Security + $30,000 pension + $20,000 IRA, both 65+$0or less$10or lessnot bounded
P5 Head of household, $45,000, one child$941or less$428or lessnot bounded
P6 Single, $1,200,000 of wages + $500,000 long-term gain$74,272or less$89,020or lessnot bounded

Full-year resident figures for 2025, state income tax only, with the same federal return in every column. Every figure is provisional. “Not shown” and “not figured” mean the engine will not state a number it cannot stand behind; hover for why.

Where the difference comes from

Colorado

Idaho

What this comparison leaves out

Mechanisms the engine does not model yet. Each one is named with the direction it would move the figure, which is where every “or less” above comes from.

Colorado

  • Colorado earned income tax credit for ITIN filers and childless filers under 25 who have no federal EITC (DR 0104TN, DR 0104CR line 9) C.R.S. §39-22-123.5 — the figure is too high without it
  • Colorado child tax credit and family affordability tax credit where a qualifying child is on a return at or under the AGI ceiling (DR 0104CN) C.R.S. §39-22-129 — the figure is too high without it
  • U.S. government interest subtraction (DR 0104AD line 2) C.R.S. §39-22-104(4)(a) — the figure is too high without it
  • Qualifying charitable contribution subtraction for non-itemizers whose gifts are not entered on the return (DR 0104AD line 12) C.R.S. §39-22-104(4)(m) — the figure is too high without it
  • Social Security subtraction for a survivor under 55, and military retirement under 55 DR 0104AD lines 3/5 and 7/8 — the figure is too high without it
  • Child and dependent care expenses credit and low-income child care credit (DR 0347) C.R.S. §§39-22-119, 39-22-119.5 — the figure is too high without it
  • Colorado-issued (on or after 1 May 1980) and territory bond interest inside the DR 0104 line 9 addition, and the bond premium and related expenses it is reduced by C.R.S. §39-22-104(3)(b) — the figure is too high without it
  • Credit for tax paid to another state C.R.S. §39-22-108 — the figure is too high without it

Idaho

  • Retirement benefits deduction (Form 39R Part B line 8) Idaho Code §63-3022A — the figure is too high without it
  • The other Form 39R Part B subtractions — U.S. government obligation interest, energy efficiency upgrades, alternative energy devices, technological equipment donations, the Idaho capital gains deduction, health insurance premiums, and the Idaho college and medical savings accounts Idaho Code §63-3022 — the figure is too high without it
  • Idaho-issued municipal interest inside the Form 39R Part A line 3 addition Idaho Code §63-3022M — the figure is too high without it
  • Permanent Building Fund tax exemptions the return does not record Idaho Code §63-3082 — the figure is too high without it
  • Credit for income tax paid to other states (Form 39R Part D) Idaho Code §63-3029 — the figure is too high without it

Taxes that are not income tax. Property tax, sales and excise taxes, and state payroll levies such as disability or paid-leave contributions are not counted here, and none of them is small. Federal tax is excluded because it is the same in both columns. A state income tax comparison is not a total tax burden comparison; see methodology.

Data status

Colorado. 2025 rules are provisional; engine coverage is implemented, with 8 mechanisms declared as not yet modelled. See the 2025 rate table.

Idaho. 2025 rules are provisional; engine coverage is implemented, with 5 mechanisms declared as not yet modelled. See the 2025 rate table.

2026 state rules are not built yet, so this page compares 2025 only. Track status on the 2025 data status board.

Try it with your own return

The six households above are reference cases. Your own return will land differently. Compare Colorado and Idaho over your own return — it stays in your browser.